Argument psychology essay

The body (or development) of the essay should be structured in relation to the thesis statement, using psychological knowledge in the argument. For example, if one would argue that there are three reasons why it is difficult to quit smoking, they should present each reason by itself and analyse the evidence for each reason. This is the argument and the writer creates credibility by good arguments. The only way one can convince the reader that the thesis is valid is to support it with relevant evidence and demonstrate critical thinking. It is also important that the argument is structured in a logical way. One way to do it could be:

In an approximate way, the logic of commons has been understood for a long time, perhaps since the discovery of agriculture or the invention of private property in real estate. But it is understood mostly only in special cases which are not sufficiently generalized. Even at this late date, cattlemen leasing national land on the western ranges demonstrate no more than an ambivalent understanding, in constantly pressuring federal authorities to increase the head count to the point where overgrazing produces erosion and weed-dominance. Likewise, the oceans of the world continue to suffer from the survival of the philosophy of the commons. Maritime nations still respond automatically to the shibboleth of the "freedom of the seas." Professing to believe in "the inexhaustible resources of the oceans," they bring species after species of fish and whales closer to extinction (9).

How to write an argumentative essay?
 The leading tone in an argumentative essay is the position of proving that the presented point of view is the correct one and possesses more truthful arguments than any other opinions. The author through proper reasoning, inducting and making conclusions, must prove the assertions or the theories of the argumentative essay. If the author fails to apply the reasons and conclusions to the topic of the essay such essay is considered to be an unsubstantiated opinion.
Argument essay writing requires the ability of the author to show that he makes conclusions according to definite facts and not on his personal assumptions only.  The idea that a theory created on a base of some sort of argument answers the question “how to write an argumentative essay”. So in reality it is the best argument essay.

The British Psychological Society states that ‘Psychology is the scientific study of people, the mind and behaviour’ (BPS). In this essay I will be discussing what is actually meant by this and whether psychology fits into both the traditional views of a science, as well as more contemporary perspectives. It is widely suggested that Psychology is a “coalition of specialities” meaning it is multi-disciplinary (Hewstone, Fincham and Foster 2005, page 4). I will therefore examine whether it could be considered wrong to think that all parts of the discipline should neatly fit into one view of a scientific approach.
In order to be considered a science, Psychology must consequently adhere to using a scientific method. If this were, as usual, taken to mean the accumulation of knowledge through systematic observation or experimentation, Psychology would likely not have an issue in being recognised, however traditional views of a science mean most areas, with the exception of Behaviourism, would not be considered a science in their own right.
In terms of a traditional science, one key point is empiricism: a reliance on observations of behaviours instead of our logical reasoning, to further aid explanations of why humans act in certain ways (Valentine, 1992:5). In this way Psychology could be considered a science as psychologists are constantly monitoring behaviours some may perceive as common sense, for example Milgram’s study into obedience (1974). However, for an outcome of any observation to be correct, we must have faith in how it was measured. Two further questions arise from this in relation to Psychology as a scientific measure: whether Psychology doe’s mis-measure, and secondly whether, as some propose, Psychology is ordinari...


... middle of paper ...


...en Goldachre. (2011). The statistical error that just keeps on coming. Available: http:///. Last accessed 10/12/2011.

Hergenhahn, . (2009). Social and Theoretical Psychology: Conceptual and Historical Issues 1. An introduction to the History of Psychology. 1 (1), p1-28.

Hewstone, M. Fincham, F. and Foster, J (2005). Psychology. Oxford: The British Psychological Society, and Blackwell Publishing. P3-23.

Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioural study of obedience. Journal of abnormal and social Psychology. 67 (4), p371-8.

Oppenheimer, R. (1956). Analogy in science. American Psychologist, 1 (11), p127-136.

The British Psychological Society. (2010). Promoting excellence in Psychology. Available: http:///. Last accessed 10/12/2011.

Valenine, . (1992). Psychology as a science. Conceptual issues in Psychology. 2nd (1), p1-7.
Read Full Essay Click the button above to view the complete essay, speech, term paper, or research paper

Argument psychology essay

argument psychology essay

The British Psychological Society states that ‘Psychology is the scientific study of people, the mind and behaviour’ (BPS). In this essay I will be discussing what is actually meant by this and whether psychology fits into both the traditional views of a science, as well as more contemporary perspectives. It is widely suggested that Psychology is a “coalition of specialities” meaning it is multi-disciplinary (Hewstone, Fincham and Foster 2005, page 4). I will therefore examine whether it could be considered wrong to think that all parts of the discipline should neatly fit into one view of a scientific approach.
In order to be considered a science, Psychology must consequently adhere to using a scientific method. If this were, as usual, taken to mean the accumulation of knowledge through systematic observation or experimentation, Psychology would likely not have an issue in being recognised, however traditional views of a science mean most areas, with the exception of Behaviourism, would not be considered a science in their own right.
In terms of a traditional science, one key point is empiricism: a reliance on observations of behaviours instead of our logical reasoning, to further aid explanations of why humans act in certain ways (Valentine, 1992:5). In this way Psychology could be considered a science as psychologists are constantly monitoring behaviours some may perceive as common sense, for example Milgram’s study into obedience (1974). However, for an outcome of any observation to be correct, we must have faith in how it was measured. Two further questions arise from this in relation to Psychology as a scientific measure: whether Psychology doe’s mis-measure, and secondly whether, as some propose, Psychology is ordinari...


... middle of paper ...


...en Goldachre. (2011). The statistical error that just keeps on coming. Available: http:///. Last accessed 10/12/2011.

Hergenhahn, . (2009). Social and Theoretical Psychology: Conceptual and Historical Issues 1. An introduction to the History of Psychology. 1 (1), p1-28.

Hewstone, M. Fincham, F. and Foster, J (2005). Psychology. Oxford: The British Psychological Society, and Blackwell Publishing. P3-23.

Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioural study of obedience. Journal of abnormal and social Psychology. 67 (4), p371-8.

Oppenheimer, R. (1956). Analogy in science. American Psychologist, 1 (11), p127-136.

The British Psychological Society. (2010). Promoting excellence in Psychology. Available: http:///. Last accessed 10/12/2011.

Valenine, . (1992). Psychology as a science. Conceptual issues in Psychology. 2nd (1), p1-7.
Read Full Essay Click the button above to view the complete essay, speech, term paper, or research paper

Media:

argument psychology essayargument psychology essayargument psychology essayargument psychology essay